Game monetization

This is an archive of a topic from NESdev BBS, taken in mid-October 2019 before a server upgrade.
View original topic
Game monetization
by on (#240721)
Sup devs. Share the ways how you monetize your games. thnx
Re: Game monetization
by on (#240726)
What I've seen is fairly straightforward: use Kickstarter to crowdfund a physical release, then buy boards and ICs, program the EPROMs, solder them together, and ship them to backers.

Otherwise you could sell a downloadable ROM on itch.io or something.
Re: Game monetization
by on (#240769)
And does anyone use globalhop sdk, mopub or admob?


[Concerns were identified with the topicality and relative notability of links in this post. --MOD]
Re: Game monetization
by on (#240772)
Those methods are applicable to games on modern touch-driven smartphone platforms, not video game consoles made before 1994. It's possible to port an NES game to a smartphone using an emulator, but it rarely turns out well unless the NES game is turn-based or can be adapted for control with only 1 or 2 buttons.


Questions that I find interesting to answer for the record inch closer to mission effing accomplished.
Re: Game monetization
by on (#240774)
tepples: you don't think this is a bot?
Re: Game monetization
by on (#240776)
As I implied with my xkcd link, this alleged bot has learned to ask relevant questions.
Re: Game monetization
by on (#240778)
Could you at least delete the spam links if you're not going to just delete this thread?
Re: Game monetization
by on (#240783)
The thread parent clearly didn't read your initial reply and just linked to some mobile ad networks instead. Please don't enable SEO for that crap.
Re: Game monetization
by on (#240788)
Had the links been to anything but the official site of each respective ad network, I would have deleted them. Or by using the term "that crap", are you trying to imply an objection to the existence of these ad networks in the first place?
Re: Game monetization
by on (#240789)
I'll note that the subject of the 2nd and 3rd links are defined in wikipedia, but the first isn't. This still smells like SEO. ("Thing X is like things Y and Z")

Ad networks necessarily require "always online", which is off-topic for almost all of the forum, and mostly correlates to specifically "android device", which is even more off-topic for the forum. For the reasons you outlined! While it is true that this is the General Stuff section of the forum, but why is something that's off-topic for almost all of the forum, from a user who has never participated in the on-topic portions of the forum, something we want to encourage here?

This isn't like the person who came around a year ago and replied to my post about vibration motors and said something tantamount to "hey, we sell vibration motors too!": that's at least vaguely germane.
Re: Game monetization
by on (#240794)
Good point about the reverse famous, famous, fictional. Given that the new user has modern mobile apps on the brain, I don't see a reason to continue this topic as it exists. Later, if I get a chance, I may try to repost it in a more on-topic form.

As for why I didn't close it earlier: As moderator, I need to walk a fine line between excluding spam and not biting newcomers.