I'm sorry, do you mean cC65, instead of cA65?
Hmm, those might be useful to try out then. Thanks. ^_^
EDIT: it would seem that the author of the programs doesn't really distinguish between CC65 and CA65 well. Anyway, I'm reading through the users' guide for ca65 (which I got through a search engine--I'm not sure how you can get to the users' guide from the main cc65.org page):
http://www.cc65.org/doc/ca65.html
I'm looking at the control commands and I see the ability to write bytes and words, etc., but I still don't see how I can have empty space that I don't have to put each byte for. For example:
I have a field of code/data that ends at $F656 and between this and the start of the vector data at $FFFA there is nothing to put (empty space). As there does not seem to be a simple .FILL control command in the assembler, what would be the most efficient way to put this empty space?
Hmm, those might be useful to try out then. Thanks. ^_^
EDIT: it would seem that the author of the programs doesn't really distinguish between CC65 and CA65 well. Anyway, I'm reading through the users' guide for ca65 (which I got through a search engine--I'm not sure how you can get to the users' guide from the main cc65.org page):
http://www.cc65.org/doc/ca65.html
I'm looking at the control commands and I see the ability to write bytes and words, etc., but I still don't see how I can have empty space that I don't have to put each byte for. For example:
I have a field of code/data that ends at $F656 and between this and the start of the vector data at $FFFA there is nothing to put (empty space). As there does not seem to be a simple .FILL control command in the assembler, what would be the most efficient way to put this empty space?